Search This Blog

Tuesday, February 2, 2016

OSU President and Board of Trustees accept responsibility for dealing with growth issues

The Oregon State University President and the OSU Board of Trustees recently met (see article by James Day, "OSU trustees to meet next week," Gazette-Times Jan. 23, 2016, p. A2 and posted online Jan. 22, 2016 as "OSU trustees to discuss housing, presidential compensation") and they accepted the responsibility for the growth issues that have led to the decline of livability in some campus neighborhoods. (See the articles by James Day, "Ray: OSU failed to deal with growth. President gets raise; will donate it to university," Gazette-Times, Jan. 30, 2016, p. A1, A3 published online as "Ray: OSU deserves blame for enrollment, housing issues," posted Jan. 29, 2016 and James Day, "OSU likely to contribute funding to livability crackdown," posted Jan. 27, 2016)

Prior to the meeting, I contacted the OSU Board of Trustees and suggested that they needed to set measurable goals for Corvallis livability and explicitly recognize the educational importance of OSU being in a small college town that historically has allowed students to easily interact with town residents who have made a major contribution to society, including OSU professors and staff members. I warned how a party school like the University of Oregon (forty miles south of OSU in Eugene, Oregon) was suffereing because the neighborhoods near campus had deteriorated so much.

See previous posts Dealing with OSU growth and student conduct issues affecting Corvallis townies (11/30/15) and OSU mails Corvallis residents glossy whitepaper on student conduct improvement efforts (12/23/15), which include my opinion piece and letter to the editor in the local newspaper: Thomas Kraemer, "As I See It: OSU's growth is a good problem to have," Gazette-Times, Nov. 30, 2015, p. A7; Thomas Kraemer, "Don't let OSU ignore metrics," Gazette-Times, Dec. 23, 2015, p. A9.

Oregon State University President Ed Ray said Friday the school deserves criticism for the way enrollment growth and the lack of a housing plan have affected Corvallis neighborhoods.

"Enrollment has grown at a pace that we didn't control," Ray said during a panel discussion on housing at a meeting of the OSU Board of Trustees. "We didn't have the controls in place, and there were a lot of dynamics in place with housing. Shame on us if you look at where we are now. How in the hell did we not realize we needed to have a conversation about housing?"

OSU's Corvallis campus enrollment grew 21 percent in a five-year spurt, from 19,923 for the 2009-10 school year to 24,158 for 2013-14. That growth has leveled off, and Ray said he is sticking to his idea that enrollment on the Corvallis campus should be capped at 28,000.

That surge has had a dramatic effect on Corvallis, with problems as wide-ranging as low vacancy rates and high prices, altered neighborhoods because of the addition of townhouses designed for students, parking, congestion and traffic as well as noise, trash and loud parties.

In 2011 the city of Corvallis and the university embarked on the Collaboration Corvallis project, which worked for three years before sunsetting shortly after the newly assembled Board of Trustees came into being.

The panel discussion, which included a city housing official, neighborhood leaders, a Realtor and OSU's top housing official, in a way served as Collaboration Corvallis 101 for the board, although much of the material was old news to many in the audience.

"I have a much better understanding of the issues now," said Trustee Paul Kelly of Portland. "This is something that we need to do more of as a board. And it's important that we don't view this panel as the end of the conversation. We need to continue to say on top of this challenge."

Kelly also thanked Corvallis resident Jeff Hess, who was in the audience, for raising the housing issue at previous board meetings.

Ray noted that the university's expired campus master plan, which was approved in 2004, "had nothing in it on housing" and added that in the work on the current update "we have to have our own conversation about housing and be attentive to it in a way we weren't a decade ago."

The new version of the master plan, which has been renamed the university district plan, was scheduled to be adopted by the City Council in August 2015, but the work has been put on hold amid land-use updates the city is in the midst of crafting as an aid to their review of the university plan.

There is no new timetable for the city's consideration of the blueprint, which is meant to guide the university's development for the next 10 years.

And the panelists seemed to recognize that it can be a challenge to make progress even when folks have the best intent.

Trish Daniels, a former Corvallis city councilor and planning commissioner as well as a work group leader during the Collaborate Corvallis, said that some of the project's "recommendation are still working their way through the boa constrictor."

Dan Larson, executive director of University Housing and Dining Services, noted that OSU's plans for a public-private partnership to develop more on-campus housing have not borne fruit yet.

"It's a not a fast process," Larson said. "We've been working on it for two years, but it's slow-moving."
(Quoted from James Day, "Rray: OSU failed to deal with growth. President gets raise; will donate it to university," Gazette-Times, Jan. 30, 2016, p. A1, A3 published online as "Ray: OSU deserves blame for enrollment, housing issues," posted Jan. 29, 2016)